Jim Kaplan'saudnet.gif (4937 bytes)

Audit Programs
AuditNet Links
AuditNet Virtual Library
AuditNet Newsletter
Ask the Auditor
Audit Jobs
Partner Discounts

Search the Site
Our Sponsors
Advertise
AuditNet Home Page


 


 


AuditNet®

Google
  Web www.auditnet.org   
pad

2nd Edition now available!

Table of Contents
Sample Chapter

This popular e-book available to current subscribers for free or to non-subscribers for purchase was recently updated. The Section 404 compliance date for smaller companies has been pushed back twice. But it appears now that the new target date for compliance, July 2007 will go ahead as scheduled and there will be no further extensions. The larger public companies or accelerated filers, have gone through two rounds of SOX audits now and many lessons have been learned regarding the scope of these audits and their costs. The second edition of this publication hopes to shed some light on what those lessons are and how small public companies can benefit.

The second edition of this publication was a result of the authors’ experience over the last two years with several Sarbanes Oxley compliance projects the PCAOB’s additional guidelines published after the first year of SOX audits and the new COSO proposed framework for smaller companies.

On October 26 2005, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) released an exposure draft, “Guidance for Smaller Public Companies Reporting on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”. Although as of the date of this writing the guide is still undergoing review it is likely to be adopted as the standard for SOX compliance involving smaller public companies. The draft is available for download at http://www.coso.org.

The new COSO framework provides more guidance regarding IT controls than does the original COSO internal control framework released in 1992. It also makes clear that none of the components of the original framework are eliminated for the smaller firm. The difference is in the way a smaller company implements the framework. Many of the recommendations can well apply to larger companies as well in terms of cost efficient controls.

The Section 404 compliance date for smaller companies has been pushed back twice. But it appears now that the new target date for compliance, July 2007 will go ahead as scheduled and there will be no further extensions.

The larger public companies or accelerated filers, have gone through two rounds of SOX audits now and many lessons have been learned regarding the scope of these audits and their costs. The second edition of this publication hopes to shed some light on what those lessons are and how small public companies can benefit.

"Many IT professionals are learning the hard way that Sarbanes-Oxley has as much to do with IT as it does with determining the quarterly profit margin." Article published in DM Review Magazine December 2004

"Lack of IT Controls Seen As Reason For Earnings Restatement. As SunTrust Banks’ Financial-reporting problems show, CIOs and CFOs need to map out business processes and controls used to produce financial statements." Information Week 10/13/2004

"AMR Research says 85 percent of companies predict that the Sarbanes Oxley Act will require them to make changes to their IT and application infrastructure." CIO.com 5/28/2003

"SOX affects IT more than any other department except finance, according to Braunstein. Sixty-five percent of the attendees at the session said that SOX is having a major impact on them, and 40% said that SOX was a "bet your job" project that would put their jobs on the line every year." Search CIO.com July 2004

Information Technology plays a fundamental roll in Section 404 compliance.

This report details what that role is and provides guidelines and specific information that will help ensure your readiness to comply.

The report also provides:

Specific information about Section 404 requirements and the PCAOB auditing standards.

Examples of policies and procedures that should be in place for compliance with Section 404.

Descriptions of IT General Controls and Application Controls that will be audited.

Detailed information about what is involved with a typical Sarbanes Oxley Project.

Sample methodology that can be used in evaluating your internal control effectiveness.

Detailed information about recognized standards for IT internal control and management such as ITIL, SEI CMM,CMMI, COSO, Cobit, OWASP, CERT, ISO 17799 and more....

Because the new auditing standards related to Sarbanes Oxley Section 404 require a much more in depth analysis, public companies can expect their auditing fees to increase.

The book presents examples of ways managers can help reduce auditing fees to contain costs intially and going forward.

Learn how ineffective Information Technology Controls could have a negative effect on the price of your company's stock.

Read how Open Source Software, Outsourcing and Wireless Technologies may be a problem for Sarbanes Oxley compliance and cost you more than you expected.

Find out what the top ten design and security flaws are for web applications and web services and how you can fail an audit if you don't address them.

Learn simple ways to protect your systems and data from intrusion and theft.

______________________

Copyright © Jim Kaplan
AuditNet® is a registered trademark of Jim Kaplan

Copyright and Disclaimer

All rights reserved. No part of this Website may be reproduced in any form, by copying from the Internet, photostat, microfilm, xerography, or any other means, or incorporated into any information retrieval system, electronic or mechanical, without the written permission of the copyright owner.

Contact AuditNet



Revised: July 09, 2006